Why guns should be legalized

December 19, at It does not say you have to be a member.

Why guns should be legalized

December 19, at It does not say you have to be a member.

Why guns should be legalized

In andthe Supreme Court issued two landmark decisions concerning the Second Amendment. In District of Columbia v. So what was that about gun nuts????? Yeah did not think so, go back to your hole and stay there.

If you have no bullets, you aren't ready. The 2nd amendment says the government can NOT do that. But go back before Scalia and before the NRA started their lobbying 's — the Supreme Court, and lower courts also, said the 2nd amendment conferred on state militias a right to bear arms — but did not give individuals a right to own or carry a weapon.

Chief Justice Warren Burger mocked the individual-rights theory of the amendment as "a fraud. What is a militia for? Is it necessary now that the USA has the most powerful army and weaponry in the world? Is it also necessary now that every state has its own National Guard?

Are Republicans Born Wimps?, by Patrick Buchanan | Creators Syndicate

Does it make sense to have a citizen army made up of self-appointed soldiers who may or may not have a sound mind and who often buy into the NRA's delusional anti-government rhetoric that is so reminiscent of Timothy McVeigh's lunacy?

Go back to muzzle loading. Sorry but ammo isn't protected by the 2nd Amendment. Doesn't matter how you try to spin it, it just isn't protected.

Why guns should be legalized

You are more than welcome to go back to packing These last five words are the biggest point of argument for gun advocates.

All of us could write doctorate-level dissertations on mental illness, screening processes, what to do about already-owned guns. The answer is this The politicians will talk up a storm about it, the news agencies will report it, the people will exchange ideologies about it and in the end, it will fade away as it always does.

This is not the first time this argument has come up and it won't be the last. The historical context is different than what you would mean if you said the phrase currently. It does not mean interference. The second amendment was written over years ago with the purpose of defending our freedom.

If our founding fathers thought that everyone should have right to bear arms they would have simply written "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Do not for get all the stabbings we have in this country. Oh yeah mexico has a zero gun tolerance. How did that work for them? December 19, at 1: This argument may have been brought up in the past and fizzled out, and it may do so again, but it's one step closer.

Why all drugs should be legal. (Yes, even heroin.)

You'll grow out of it. If you're 40 and not a conservative, you have no brain. Churchill December 19, at 1: Men could also write something different NOW and regulate the use of guns more effectively.

Stop talking about these amendments as of they had been brought from space or sent by gods or something. In dicta, the Court listed many longstanding prohibitions and restrictions on firearms possession as being consistent with the Second Amendment. You people are a trip. Get the fact before you speak or just keep quite.

Do you have what it takes to be a minuteman? He was so sure too. I own several firearms.

Best of MSNBC

So don't call me a liberal leftist though I am far from the right. The types of "modern sporting rifles" that are avaialble today are sickening.Watch breaking news videos, viral videos and original video clips on kaja-net.com The word statement of President Donald Trump on the Saudi royals' role in the grisly murder of Washington Post contributor Jamal Khashoggi is a remarkable document, not only for its ice-cold.

With support for marijuana decriminalization, and even legalization, on the rise, Abby Huntsman explains why politicians need to take a closer look at the benefits of making pot legal. Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything is the debut non-fiction book by University of Chicago economist Steven Levitt and New York Times journalist Stephen J.

kaja-net.com was published on April 12, , by William kaja-net.com book has been described as melding pop culture with economics.

What time is Amanpour on CNN?

By late , the book had sold over 4 million copies worldwide. If you want to achieve anything in life, it’s time to stop smoking pot.

This advice runs quite contrary to the current popular culture. Recreational marijuana use has gone mainstream in the past few years as various states have legalized its use.

Opinion. When You Use Marijuana, In Any State, for Any Reason, Forget Owning Guns.

Global Gateway (24 Videos) Overview[ edit ] The book is a collection of articles written by Levitt, an expert who had gained a reputation for applying economic theory to diverse subjects not usually covered by "traditional" economists. In Freakonomics, Levitt and Dubner argue that economics is, at root, the study of incentives.

Ft Collins, CO –-(kaja-net.com)- Marijuana use, gun purchases, and BATF. US Attorneys are currently prosecuting.

Why or Why Shouldn't The United States Build A Wall Along The Border of Mexico?